A Brief Review On Family Tree Maker 2017
As we know that family tree maker 2019 and 2017 are the latest versions of family tree maker software. Family Tree Maker 2017 (FTM 2017) was launched on July 16, 2017. The 19 months since Ancestry.com announced Family Tree Maker’s retirement in December 2015 have been a rough ride for the venerable genealogy application. By the 1st of January 2017, all support for FTM and connectivity with Ancestry was supposed to be gone. In this post, we will give family tree maker 2017 reviews so that you get a well understanding.
However, the Mac version’s creator, Software MacKiev, stated in February 2016 that they had purchased FTM from Ancestry and will continue to develop both the Mac and Windows versions. At that time company offer free updates.
Users of Family Tree Maker 2 and 3 for Mac, as well as FTM 2012 and 2014 for Windows, would lose access to Ancestry. They’d have to pay to upgrade to Family Tree Maker 2017 if they wanted such connectivity. Paid software upgrades are prevalent in the industry, so they’re to be expected, but they frequently include actual enhancements and new features. FamilySync is a substitute for TreeSync, a previous function, and it may be an improvement. FTM includes three brand-new features. Some of its functions, though, appear to have been reduced, and the user interface hasn’t been updated in several years.
Opinions on the balance of upgrades and downgrades may differ, but this article summarises my assessment. I’ve already assessed how effectively FTM handles GEDCOM, so I’ll only talk about modifications since then.
New Features & Enhancements Of Family Tree Maker 2017
FTM’s basic functionality hasn’t changed, and the user interface (UI) hasn’t changed much since versions 1 and 2010 for Mac and Windows, respectively. In some ways, this is beneficial because there isn’t much new to learn, but there are negatives as well (more below). MacKiev touts four big enhancements, which I’ll go over one by one:
- Integration with FamilySearch
- Use of colour coding
- Photographic Darkroom
Integration with FamilySearch, one of the most popular genealogical record providers, would be beneficial if it functioned as well as integrated with Ancestry. Using the web clipping tool in previous versions of FTM, you could merge data from FamilySearch and other websites, although searching and merging from FamilySearch is comparable to, but not identical to, Ancestry.
The Source Citations from FamilySearch have a number of issues:– The Source Citation to be inserted is excessively long.
- The actual citation is different; while it isn’t too long, it isn’t in the preferred format.
- Rather than one citation for the FamilySearch record, multiple citations are added, one for FamilySearch and one for each of the citations at FamilySearch.
For the FamilySearch entry, there should only be one fully formatted source citation. Here’s an example from Elizabeth Shown Mills’ Evidence Explained:
Each of the citations from FamilySearch should not be inserted, and the whole URL should only be entered in the Web Address box, not in the Citation Detail.
I haven’t seen a convincing explanation for why Ancestry chose to replace TreeSync. After public outrage, they decided to replace it with an application programme interface (API) that works with both FTM and RootsMagic. RootsMagic has announced that its Ancestry connection will be available in April 2017 as a free update to their current version, RootsMagic 7. (it was actually released in June).
This is a brand-new function for RootsMagic, in contrast to FTM, which offered a paid upgrade for their replacement feature. RootsMagic, like FTM, faced a delay in releasing their update, however, it was only two months late rather than two and a half.
Multiple copies of FTM can be synced with one Ancestry tree in FamilySync. Whereas TreeSync could only sync one FTM tree with one Ancestry tree. FamilySync appears to be speedier than TreeSync in my opinion. It performs the first steps of the sync in the foreground, then dismisses the sync window and completes the sync in the background, allowing the user to continue working.
Another potential enhancement is the new Sync Weather Report, which has the potential to be useful provided it is kept up-to-date. Otherwise, clicking through each time the user syncs their tree will be a nuisance.
FTM Vs RootsMagic
So FamilySync is just a TreeSync replacement with a few enhancements. It’s interesting to contrast FamilySync with RootsMagic’s implementation of the Ancestry API. RootsMagic has released a video demonstrating how their Ancestry integration looks and works, and you can try it out in the current version of the software, including the free RootsMagic Essentials edition.
Although FTM’s FamilySync and RootsMagic’s TreeShare work in similar ways, TreeShare provides more exact control over alterations. First, instead of a text-only change log, RootsMagic offers a lovely color-coded display of the modifications. Second, instead of approving or rejecting all changes in a batch, users can approve or reject individual changes. In RootsMagic, for example, the user modified a birth date and deleted a death event, but instead of having to accept or reject both, he could accept the birth change and reject the death change when assessing the modifications.
However, I believe that FTM is slightly better when it comes to Ancestry hints, which are a recent addition to RootsMagic’s Web Hints feature because RootsMagic does not have a built-in web browser to examine the real record, whereas FTM does. In FTM, you can see both the clue and the image, if any, immediately in the Web Search workspace, however in RootsMagic, you must open the hint link in your web browser to see it.
Colour Coding is a new feature in Family Tree maker 2017 that allows you to give a person and their ancestors up to four different colours. Filtered lists can also be created with it. The colours are shown in both the Tree and Index views. For quite some time, other applications have had a comparable feature. Reunion, for example, allows you to Mark people in order to include them in search results. Colour coding is comparable in Legacy Family Tree 9 (and they didn’t even trademark the term “Color Coding”). Colour coding is unquestionably useful, particularly for filtered listings.
When I went to FTM, I missed one of Reunion’s features: marking. Although the two capabilities work well together, the option to preserve filtered lists in Family Tree Maker 2017 may be more valuable than Color Coding. For instance, if I want to make a filtered list of all persons in my tree who died in New York between 1659 and 1999 so that I may search for them on Ancestry, I can now save the filtered list so that I don’t have to construct it again the next time I open Family Tree Maker 2017. I had no issues with colour coding because it worked great for me.
Photo Darkroom is a brand-new tool in Family Tree Maker 2017 that allows you to darken faded black-and-white photos. A new button in the Media workspace has been allocated to the functionality. Light, Moderate, and Intensive repairs are available, depending on how faded the original is. Before saving the modifications, you can compare the before and after images.
Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, and Sharpness have their own settings under Advanced Settings. On a faded shot, I saw that the tool made a small but noticeable impact.
My only criticism is that it was difficult to locate the tool’s Help. There were no hits when I searched for “photo darkroom” and “faded photo.” However, I discovered both search phrases in the Companion Guide. Once I knew where to go, I was able to locate them in the Help file.
It’s almost as though MacKiev changed their minds about the name of the product. Because it’s referred to as both “Photo Darkroom” and “Faded Photo Repair Tool,” but they both perform the same thing.
Family Tree Maker 2017 Other Improvements
Apart from this, developers makers some more changes in FTM. The most significant modification is that the Mac and Windows versions now use the same codebase. This means that their functionalities are nearly identical, and if a developer needs to make a modification, they should only have to do so once rather than twice. The only difference between the two platforms, as far as I’m aware, is that the Windows version supports charting and publishing plugins, whereas the Mac version does not.
FTM’s handling of GEDCOM has also undergone significant adjustments. MacKiev president Jack Minsky previously stated that FTM would be as GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliant as feasible. The following are changes in Family Tree Maker 2017 that head in this direction:
- By default, UTF-8 encoding is used, and incorrect character sets are removed.
- Importing and exporting lat/long coordinates
- Exporting concatenation tags successfully
- Importing tag “RESN privacy” as private facts
- ANSEL character set correctly
- Importing and exporting child orders appropriately
In terms of GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliance, FTM 2017 still has room for improvement, but it’s getting there. The majority of other developers don’t bother to strive to increase their compliance.
A last-minute addition, the developer add a new feature to FTM 2017 that is the “FTM Co-Pilot Program. Which grew out of the company’s Test Drive programme. According to the release email from Jack Minsky, this feature is expected to check in with the user after 48 hours of use. And “run an optional diagnostic test to validate that everything has gone as planned.” Furthermore, it appears that original test drivers will receive priority service in MacKiev’s 24/7 Live Chat.
Areas for Improvement
The advances in FTM 2017 are unquestionably the proverbial “two leaps forward,” but in some areas it stalled or even regressed, beginning with the UI, which hasn’t changed much since the 2010 versions. It’s starting to appear old and worn out. I’m not promoting change for the sake of it; the app’s usability and accessibility could be improved for both power users and disabled users. As a non-expert in this field, I can think of two things that could be better:
- Increase the contrast between UI elements that are dissimilar to make them simpler to distinguish. The Filter button, for example, is nearly indistinguishable from its background.
- Treat the Web Search workspace as if it were a web browser. I’ve never used a web browser without basic navigation keyboard shortcuts:
While they’re at it, MacKiev might give FTM a much-needed makeover.
A number of the UI tweaks made by MacKiev irritate me. One such modification is the replacement of the simple icons that indicated material related to sources with thumbnails. This is hardly an improvement in my opinion.
It detracts from the UI’s neat and tidy appearance. Furthermore, the thumbnails omit some of the source text, which I find more valuable than the thumbnails. However, that is only one man’s opinion.
FTM 2017’s inability to open and convert versions of FTM files older than 2008 for Windows. It should be able to open and convert ALL previous versions of FTM, not just the ones from 2008 to now. FTM should be able to import versions 1 through 2014 if RootsMagic can.
It’s absurd that users who have older versions of Family Tree Maker must first convert their files using the Family Tree Maker 2005 Starter Edition (as explained here). FTM should be able to automate this process in such a way that the user is unaware of it.
The other thing I’d like to notice (there may be others) is that users must now submit their trees to Ancestry in order to receive green leaf tips, which I consider a downgrade. In Family Tree Maker 2017, I constructed a fresh tree, and there were only indications from FamilySearch. Ancestry, I believe, was the catalyst for this transition.
What better way for Ancestry to gain more free content than for thousands of FTM users to be forced to upload their trees? Users of RootsMagic must also upload their existing desktop trees if they want Ancestry WebHints, which is fascinating. If you don’t want other people to view your trees, you can make them private and even keep them out of Ancestry’s index.
Who Family Tree Maker Is For
People with Ancestry accounts: despite RootsMagic breaking FTM’s monopoly on Ancestry connectivity, FTM is still a solid alternative, especially for existing FTM users who don’t want to shift, despite some issues with FamilySync.
GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliance: FTM continues to progress in this area, with further changes planned in the future.
In terms of performance, features, GEDCOM compliance, and web integration, FTM remains the best alternative for Mac users. While other apps offer more attractive interfaces, their GEDCOM compliance is particularly poor.
Users of FTM versions older than 3 or 2014 will almost certainly benefit from an upgrade. As there have been significant performance and bug changes.
I fall within the first three categories, thus I’ll keep using FTM. Even if I can’t help but feel a little disappointed with version 2017. It does have some new features and enhancements. I’d have to think long and hard about spending the whole $79.95, but I believe the upgrade fee of $39.95 is well worth it.
In this post, you will get family tree maker 2017 reviews like what is family tree maker 2017 and its features. Also, we tell that what are improvements that need in FTM 2017. If you also get any information about this genealogy software then you can call the family tree maker support number. Our Toll-Free number is +1-800-697-1474.